Instantly update your Lambda functions (development)

Why?

Deploying the whole stack whenever you want to check your changes is tiresome and boring.
If you do it by pushing to the CI system - it's even slower.
If you do it locally, it's still slow. And if your build relies on multiple secrets (like most do), you can't even do it properly from your local dev.
Changing files in-line through the lambda panel is painful - you can't paste TypeScript code because that will result in Syntax Errors. You also risk forgetting about some changes in the code, and later losing them after the next push, or - even worse - QAing and approving the functionality and merging to master, even though the code in the repository does not have the required fix. It's a mess :)

Watch me below use this functionality to get a feel of what this is all about.

The source code for playing along is here:

xolvio/cdk-typescript-tooling-example-live
Contribute to xolvio/cdk-typescript-tooling-example-live development by creating an account on GitHub.

What?

Using the TypeScriptFunction from our tool gives you the ability to use the update-typescript-function command.

Updating all functions:

Assuming your stack is declared at ./src/cdk.ts Run it like this:

npx update-typescript-function ./src/cdk.ts

And it will quickly and automatically update all TypeScript Lambda functions found in your CDK Stack.

Configuration:

Actually, you might need to do a few exports first... ;-)

export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=ACCESS_KEY
export AWS_REGION=us-east-2

In the future, we do want to read those from ~/.aws/credentials, but for now please export the values.

We need your cdk file to export a stack, in most cases, you will do something like this:

import * as cdk from "@aws-cdk/core";
import { SalesSystem } from "./SalesSystem";

const baseStackName = "SalesSystemExample";
export default new SalesSystem(new cdk.App(), baseStackName);

If you need to do something async before returning a stack, a pattern like this should work:

export default (async () => {
  const stackSuffix = await getStackSuffix(baseStackName);
  return new SalesSystem(new cdk.App(), `${baseStackName}${stackSuffix}`);
})();

We like to deploy a stack per branch, so all our branches have different StackNames and also differently named (suffixed) resources. Because of that, we rely on the branch name to cache your stack information. Worst case scenario you will have cache built multiple times with the same data.

Updating single function:

The compilation and uploading of functions happen in parallel. Because of that it is crazy fast (<10 s for ~20 functions) and in most cases that is what you should be doing. It comes with the advantage that if you change a code that's used by a few different functions, all of them will be redeployed. Sometimes you might not realize that some piece of code is used in multiple places and get yourself in some weird inconsistent state.
But if you must, or if you have hundreds of functions in the stack, it's simple, get the Logical ID of a function (using aws cli or going to the stack using their cloudformation panel), and do:

npx update-typescript-function ./src/cdk.ts PurchaseEndpointIKYULFRNR9VJ

Library available here: https://www.npmjs.com/package/cdk-typescript-tooling

Let me know if you have any questions or thoughts in the comments below.


Let us help you on your journey to Quality Faster

We at Xolv.io specialize in helping our clients get more for less. We can get you to the holy grail of continuous deployment where every commit can go to production — and yes, even for large enterprises.

Feel free to schedule a call or send us a message below to see how we can help.

User icon
Envelope icon

or

Schedule a 30m call
  • Add types to your AWS lambda handler

  • How to expose a local service to the internet

    From time to time you might need to expose your locally running service to the external world - for example you might want to test a webhook that calls your service. To speed up the test/development feedback loop it would be great to be able to point that webhook to your local machine.

  • For loops in JavaScript (vs _.times)

    From time to time I still see a for loop in JavaScript codebases. Linters are frequently angry about them. Let's see how we can replace them.